Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01859
Original file (BC 2014 01859.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
              RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2014-01859

 			COUNSEL:  NONE

			HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of 
Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect his earned awards 
while attached to the 340th Bomb Wing and 51st Fighter Wing. 

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

The clerk who processed his discharge was in a hurry and did not 
complete the paperwork properly.  He served for 8 years and 
knows he has more awards than what is listed on his DD Form 214.  
He was assigned to the 340th Bomb Wing and the 51st Fighter Wing, 
both were highly decorated units.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is a former member of the Air Force who served 
from 23 October 1956 through 24 February 1965.

After a review of the applicant’s records, AFPC/DPSID verified 
he is entitled to the award of the Air Force Outstanding Unit 
award with one Bronze Oak Leaf cluster and the National Defense 
Service Medal.  His records will be updated accordingly upon 
final Board action. 

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSID recommends denial.  The applicant was assigned to the 
51st Organizational Maintenance Squadron (OMS), a subordinate 
unit of the 51st Interceptor Wing (IW) between 8 September 1962 
and 24 February 1965.  The 51st OMS shared in the award of the 
AFOUA awarded to the 51st IW for the inclusive period of 26 March 
1962 to 30 August 1963 and 1 January 1965 to 31 December 1966.

The applicant requests awards for his service with the 340th Bomb 
Wing; however, there is no official documentation verifying the 
applicant was assigned to the 340th Bomb Wing or any subordinate 
units.  The applicant was directly assigned to the 340th 
Organizational Maintenance Squadron; however, DPSID could not 
verify any awards for that unit.  

The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 29 September 2014, for review and comment within 
30 days (Exhibit D).  As of this date, this office has received 
no response.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the available evidence of record and the applicant's 
complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, 
we agree with the opinion and recommendation of AFPC/DPSID and 
adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the 
applicant has not provided sufficient evidence to support his 
request.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, 
we find relief beyond what has been administratively corrected 
is not warranted. 

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-01859 in Executive Session on 12 March 2015, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:


The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 30 Apr 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant’s Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 7 Jul 14.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 29 Sep 14.


Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03890

    Original file (BC-2012-03890.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03890 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to reflect he was awarded the following: a. Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He served in Guam with the 3960th Strategic Wing for 176...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01753

    Original file (BC-2012-01753.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The PUC is awarded to units of the United States Armed Forces for outstanding performance in action against an armed enemy occurring on, or after 7 Dec 41, for United States Air Force units. After a thorough review of the applicant's official military personnel record, they were unable to verify he was assigned to any unit that was awarded the PUC during his term of service. We took notice of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00139

    Original file (BC 2014 00139.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00139 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect award of the Silver Star (SS) Medal. The applicant claims that the Lieutenant General, Commander of the Fifth Air Force, awarded him the SS Medal in Apr-May 53. We note the documentation he provided reflects for the time period in question he enlisted in the Navy and therefore...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01946

    Original file (BC-2012-01946.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reiterates that he spent time in Vietnam with the 428th Tactical Fighter Squadron in 64 and 65, and identifies his commander. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant’s complete submission, we believe a preponderance of the evidence indicates the applicant served in the Republic of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04962

    Original file (BC 2013 04962.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, personnel serving in Thailand, Laos, or Cambodia in direct support of operations in Vietnam during the same time period were also eligible for the VSM. In accordance with Public Law 107-314, § 542, the AFEM, for participation in Operation FREQUENT WIND, may be exchanged for the Vietnam Service Medal. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01245

    Original file (BC-2006-01245.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR was able to verify his entitlement to the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA) and his entitlement to four Bronze Service Stars for his Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) while assigned to the 70th OMS, 70th Bomb Wing from September 1966 to December 1969. While the Air Force was able to verify his entitlement to the AFOUA and four Bronze Stars for his VSM, the Air Force was unable to verify from...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03850 ADDENDUM

    Original file (BC-2011-03850 ADDENDUM.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Areas of deployment supported Kunsan AB, Korea, and Taegu AB, Korea, during the Pueblo crisis, which he spent 98 continuous days at Taegu AB. The following documentary was considered: Exhibit F. Record of Proceedings, dated 8 May 2012, w/atchs. Exhibit H. Letter, AFPD/DPSID, dated 25 January 2013.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02385

    Original file (BC 2014 02385.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02385 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. His DD 214 was administratively corrected to reflect seven months and nine days of foreign service. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03532

    Original file (BC 2014 03532.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The AFAM was authorized by the Secretary of the Air Force on 12 Oct 80 and is awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States and foreign military personnel, below the rank of Colonel, after 30 Sep 80 who while serving in any capacity with the United States Air Force, distinguish themselves by meritorious service or achievement. After a thorough review of the applicant’s official military personnel records, they were unable to verify award of the AFAM. Therefore, we recommend...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02545

    Original file (BC 2014 02545.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA) – administratively corrected. DPSID states after a thorough review of the applicant’s official military personnel record, they were unable to verify award of the PUC or the AFOUA for service with the 303rd Bomb Wing, the AFEM and the VSM. However, if the applicant provided official documentation verifying service in Vietnam for 30 consecutive days or 60 non-consecutive days he could elect to receive award of the VSM in lieu of the AFEM.